synopsis of my mind!

I don’t know whom to blame for!
The following is a fictional portrayal of characters.
An anchor trying to ask few questions of a young movie-icon, (i don’t know what) only to soothe an ego, a droplet of creativity, or to bemoan death of the rest.
Critics have long fled the battle field here.
A Television set broadcasting four different channels. Imagine how opinions would change if I’ll be placed with four heads and one voice to shout? This is pure crotchety of events.
Movie star has come to the show. He is accompanied by different channel that has more of an English breakfast eating habit, his breath is sinking down for all the fear of soul that cannot hold onto its gravity, lack of efforts shown on previous instances. There is another channel standing in the crowd. It has dark ancient roots; things that grow are also subject to evolution, but what has happened to Indian movie industry.
It has an appetizing taste!
Their business logo is somewhat lengthier, few meters long (an approximate of 10,000 years old). But suits well to the occasion. Read out this loud, because I want to check that if you really support the cause or not: Age has been denied an entry onto the stage of Bollywood saga.
Question: how many times our heroes struggle even in a fictitious scene?
Question: how many times they lose and never left with any form of intensity?
Zilch. Almost nothing.
The shocking revelation is that being victorious is not always about winning.
Find it Realize it You can deny it Cannot destroy it.
Evolution. No, rather we are depreciating to low-lying zone of absolute self-contentment for achieving less and even more joyful over the fact that we have not moved an inch further towards progress.
Anchor has prepared his list of things to be asked next. Your recent movie has crashed to death. So, what are your opinions on it?
Before that I would like to check what audience has to say about it.
Anchor: Ok.
First interviewee – there is no story. Songs are good. It is not his fault, our hero was not given any chance to do anything.
Second interviewee – how can you expect him to do anything without any script being ready in the first place?
Third and last – scripts are illusive in nature but we like our hero to be what he does and not.
Anchor: I ever knew it! That you can act. Your talent least requires any kind of script to be written in hand.
Actor: laughs over something!
Anchor: do we really hire writers for our movies?
That was not a question. And he also starts laughing. In a race of two, to find who is the biggest penultimate loss to country.
Third channel is least popular but more effective. It covers small and self-employed movie directors to unleash the real power of holding camera and making audience participates in the process of movie-making. Their vision suggests that an audience member should not be left at the mercy of songs, dance and repetitive dialogue delivery.
Anchor: we have come to know that you are also going to promote other young artists from different fields of life.
Actor: Definitely. Why not? If I can do something over here, it would be fantastic. My new movie also shares similar viewpoint. It’ll be exceptional if we can do both, promotion and social welfare, at the same time.
Abruptly, it was over.
The conclusion that all these three channels have found is that if by any stretch of imagination we accept that there was no storyline to work on, then why did he sign.
These actors have not been able to repeat single act of brilliance that they so wrongly endorse all years long during their life.